1671850488981

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Dr. Lubinda Haabazoka

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Dr. Lubinda Haabazoka

IMF and Investor Confidence – Dr. Lubinda Haabazoka

…So why isn’t money flowing in and why is The Kwacha losing value even with “Papa and Mama IMF” on board?

By Dr. Lubinda Haabazoka

THIS article is not for political cadres but intellectuals that enjoy mature economic debate. The article is aimed at contributing to national economic development.

I never forget especially heated economic discourse. Today I want to address the issue of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and investor confidence.

The whole country (Zambia) knows that I have never supported IMF packages. Those that argue for packages say that with the IMF on board, investor confidence increases and money flows into the country. Those against including me believe that IMF ties the hands of package recipients therefore removing space for innovation. Conditions are also harsh and detrimental to the livelihoods of citizens.

I know a number of economists that supported the IMF package but have gone underground. Hardly a few months after getting an IMF package, The Zambian Kwacha has lost value trading from K15.3 to K18.03 in a 2 month period. Negotiations with lenders have also stalled creating anxiety amongst various stakeholders. So why isn’t money flowing in and why is The Zambian Kwacha losing value even with “Papa and Mama IMF” on board?

Many economists unfortunately are locked up in economic theories that are heavily influenced by the Breton Woods mood. If maybe the IMF could deliver strong fundamentals in developing nations in the 80s or 90s, the IMF of today unfortunately has lost its influence and ability to positively affect economic growth in most member countries.

When the IMF was created, the global economy evolved around western powers. China was weak and the Soviet Union was in self isolation. Today however, China has even a much stronger influence in the global economy than the USA and Europe combined. Russia is also very much part of the global economy with Brazil, India and Middle East countries also moving away from western influence. The mood coming out of South Africa also indicates that the African National Congress (ANC) will be busy fighting western sanctions against Zimbabwe soon.

Against this background, a country that is on an IMF package today doesn’t really get the good image from investors that matter in modern day economics. Despite being members themselves, countries such as Russia, China, Saudi Arabia and other economic giants view the IMF as an institution that advances US economic influence around the world. So any country that rushes to the IMF sort of signals that they are tilting towards the west and as such, Chinese investments in particular dry out. This trend is usually copied by other countries with a similar ideology.

Today the Britain Russia India China South Africa (BRICS) block is being joined by Saudi Arabia, Egypt among other emerging economies. The BRICS bank with assets of over $100bn is being viewed as a possible successor of the World Bank. With Saudi Arabia joining BRICS, the world will have to forget about the Petro-dollar system and with it United States (US) global economic dominance. Empires last maximum 100 years. That’s what history has taught us. Turkey, Egypt, Greece, the United Kingdom (UK), Iran, Italy and even Mongolia had once dominated the whole world. But today, these countries are shells of their past.

The best approach for African countries is to draw up their economic development plans. Plans that will be independent of major influencers. Such plans should have a buy in of all citizens. A country cannot develop when half of the country is called opposition and the other half ruling. Development means everyone pulling in one direction. The best way to gain respect and attract investors from everywhere is to remain neutral. That way, investors from both worlds will come.

Today it’s an illusion to think a country can develop without China or Russia. China brings infrastructure and trade. Russia brings in energy and agriculture inputs. It’s also wrong to think a developing country can have it easy without Europe and the United States of America (USA). We still live in a Breton Woods economic system where are financial transactions are done from New York. For now, we are still tied up.

To conclude, the IMF cannot be a Saviour at this point. The only Saviour we have is ourselves. We need to create an environment of unity. Then create an environment for wealth creation. We need to create industries. Create jobs. Our Zambian people should have money! We need to uplift our Zambian citizens so that they are able to compete on the global stage. That should be our preoccupation now.

We also need to advise that cooperatives unfortunately cannot create wealth for now. We need to perfect the model if they have to succeed. Let’s consult widely. Listen more!

Thanks 🙏🏿

Notes on Author: “Dr. Lubinda Haabazoka is Director of the University of Zambia (UNZA) Graduate School of Business and former President of the Economics Association of Zambia (EAZ).

Dr. Haabazoka holds a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Economics from Rostov State Economics University obtained under joint Government of the Republic of Zambia GRZ/Russian Government Scholarship.
Dr. Haabazoka has worked for Bank Vozrojdenie and Sberbank in Russia 2003-2005 and was Assistant Lecturer and Researcher in the Banking Department of Rostov State Economics University 2005-2009.
Dr. Haabazoka worked for the Copperbelt University (CBU) from 2010-2017 as Senior Lecturer and Head of the Accounting and Finance Department in the School of Business.

Dr. Haabazoka has served as non executive director on more than 7 boards including the NRFA, ZIPAR, NEAC, PAM among others.
Dr. Haabazoka is also an author of more than 4 academic books, over 30 research papers and over 18 book chapters in peer reviewed publications like Springer and De Gruyter.
He has advised and done research works for the Zambian government, World Bank, international Hedge Funds and banks and other legal entities.

Dr. Haabazoka has negotiated and structured project finance deals and contracts for various institutions worth over $600m.
Dr. Haabazoka has facilitated and presented papers at high level conferences including high level side meetings at the United Nations General Assembly in New York, Atom Expo in Sochi and International Atomic Agency in Austria. Dr. Haabazoka is convenor of the National Economic Summit in Zambia.

Dr. Haabazoka is a regular commentator on national and international economic issues published with CNN, Bloomberg, Financial Times, DW, SABC, Russia 24, CCTV, ZNBC, Voice Of America among others”.

On Tuesday, 14th June, 2022, President Hakainde Sammy Hichilema met International Monetary Fund (IMF) Deputy Managing Director Antoinette Monsio Sayeh at State House

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may have missed

绝妙集团公布50亿美元投资计划​作者:海伦·博瓦利亚(Hellen Bwalya)​绝妙集团有限公司(Wonderful Group of Companies Limited)通过其子公司赞比亚联合资本化肥有限公司(United Capital Fertilizer Zambia Company Limited),在其工业园区举行的奠基仪式上,正式启动了一项跨越2025年至2030年的50亿美元中长期工业投资宏伟计划。集团首席执行官黄耀弛先生在致答谢词时强调,该举措巩固了集团致力于提升赞比亚经济潜力、农业发展和就业水平的长期承诺。本次活动展示了多项价值数亿美元的制造业扩建及基础设施升级项目,旨在将赞比亚打造成中东非地区的核心工业强国。​在这项50亿美元的投资承诺中,园区内大规模的化工与化肥厂建设处于核心地位。继投资6.8亿美元的一期尿素生产厂竣工并投入运营后,集团正在稳步推进投资3.00亿美元的农化磷肥厂建设,预计将于第一季度投产,用于生产专用二铵(DAP)化肥。进一步的扩建计划还包括投资16亿美元的二期尿素项目和投资7.00亿美元的磷肥扩建项目,同时集团还将努力吸引更多绿色与高新技术投资者入驻运营。​为了支持这一工业增长并优化大宗运输物流,绝妙集团宣布了多项基础设施升级计划,包括升级连接当地矿山并穿过该工业园区的区域铁路网络、将蒙格维路(Mungwi Road)的部分路段改造为双向四车道,以及拓宽通往蒙布瓦路(Mumbwa Road)的连接线。这些基础设施项目将在完成内部财务手续后,通过政府与社会资本合作(PPP)模式实施,以畅通交通流量并缩短物资交付时间。黄耀弛先生对关键金融合作伙伴表达了谢意,向由艾莎银行(Absa Bank PLC)和赞比亚国家商业银行(ZANACO Bank PLC)牵头的银行银团为相关建设提供资金支持致以深切感谢。​在澄清公司身份时,黄耀弛先生指出,尽管早期外界存在误解,但绝妙集团和联合资本化肥公司均是值得骄傲的赞比亚本土企业。他强调,管理层中仅有两名中国籍员工,且均未直接参与日常运营,企业的行政控制权与管理权完全掌握在赞比亚本地人手中。黄耀弛先生重申了集团的承诺,并对赞比亚实现自产自销、对外出口以及引领东非和南部非洲工业未来的能力表达了坚定信心。