Access to Information Bill: is this the start of New Dawn summersaults?

0

 

By Nicholas Bwalya

It is 20 years since proponents of the Access to Information (ATI) Bill begun their advocacy to have this important law enacted. Governments have come and gone, MMD and PF regimes all leaving the Bill to gather dust on the shelves of the Ministry of Information.

 

The PF government was even more daring than the MMD because in its manifesto of 2011 to 2016, the party pledged to enact the Bill into law. But as they say the rest is history.

In a country that is among the top of the Corruption Perception Index, enacting the Access to Information law is a great stride towards fighting corruption and promoting transparency in governance. Availing information to the public not only promotes transparency but also enables leaders to be held accountable to the citizens. On the other hand, hiding information to the public creates mistrusts and can stifle people’s participation in governance and hinder them from making informed decisions.

During the run up to elections, the then opposition UPND campaigned on the premises of enhancing media freedoms and on page 39 of their 2021-2026 the party commits to ”enacting a consultatively established Freedom of Information Act, which will play an essential role in keeping government transparent and accountable and to expose any government misconduct and waste.”

Against this background, Information and Media Permanent Secretary Kennedy Kalunga recently announced that government was to take the ATI Bill to all the 10 provinces of the country in order to widen stakeholder consultation. The PS said following the recent consultation meeting with the media and other stakeholders on the Bill in Lusaka, some stakeholders have proposed to the Ministry that more stakeholders need to be consulted on the Bill across the country, which proposal the Ministry has fully embraced.

This statement from the Ministry appears very innocuous but going by similar pronouncements from previous governments, there is clearly an element of buying time in enacting this Bill. Previous governments made similar statements and the country has not enacted this Bill because of such delays. What should be of more concern to advocates of the ATI Bill is that the Ministry clearly failed to put a time frame in which these countrywide consultations will be conducted.  This is saddening.

There are many questions that the new stance by the ministry has raised because the ATI has been on the books of this institution for two decades now and consultations after consultation have been held with various stakeholders.  Going by this new suggestion from the Ministry, one would ask, does the ministry have resources to effectively carry out these consultations? Without a good resource envelop, we might end up with a stalled process on account of lack of funds and then we are back to another long wait.

There is therefore need for the ministry to come up with a defined roadmap with clear milestones on how it will handle the ATI Bill process before this process reverts to the usual summersaults it has been subjected to. Access to information law is not just for the media but every Zambian who is interested in accountability of the government and all leaders at various levels. It won’t be in the interest of the nation to see the Bill being further put to more flip flops by the New Dawn government.  The Author is a Journalist and Development Communication Specialist

Will UPND deliver ATI?

By Derrick Sinjela

CIVIL Society Groups and individuals say government is shifting a goal post following Information and Media Minister Permanent Secretary (PS) Kennedy Kalulnga’s statement that the United Party for National Development (UPND) leadership had resolved to engage interests groups in all 10 provinces of Zambia before enactment of the Access To Information (ATI) law.

Briefing PANOS Executive Director Vusumuzi Sifile and Teldah Mawarire  of Inter News Network Zambia, Kalunga reiterated government resolve to enact the ATI bill.

And Mr. Sifile and Ms.Mawarire commended Government for the open-door and inclusive manner it is handling the ATI process.

However, Media Network for Child Rights and Development (MNCRD) Executive Director recollected that from 2002, when Zambia’s 14th Vice President, W.K Mutale Nalumango, was then Minister of Information, the then Freedom of Information (FoI), now Access to Information (ATI) has been a bill.

“What more do we need to know around the provinces? This is 20 years of consultations. This Bill empowers people to hold their leaders accountable. I guess, if it was the other way round, it could have passed a long time ago. Let us embrace a society where being held accountable should not be a burden to us. If it is, then it becomes suspicious,” lamented Mr. Kabwe.

And Henry Malumo described Kabwe’s viewpoint as a great reflection, urging the Zambian Parliament to fast track the process as people are aware and privy.

“Allowing as many people as possible to learn and understand the issues is critical,” advised Malumo.

 

Media academician Sam Phiri has been tracking this procrastination in successive government delaying to actualise a sought after media friendly environment.

This is a 19-year-old delayed ATI train, yet to reach its destination:  “ATI Law in Zambia – Lest We Forget… JANUARY 2003 – Vice President Enoch Kavindele, = Government needs sufficient research and thereafter the ATI bill would be brought back to parliament

FEBRUARY 2005 – Information Minister Mutale Nalumango = ATI law should not be rushed although there had been no shift in the government’s principles of transparency, accountability and good governance

JANUARY 2006 – Vice-President Lupando Mwape, = ATI law could breed chaos because excess freedom is dangerous, but the bill would be reintroduced into parliament after taking into account certain concerns

FEBRUARY 2006 – Information Minister Vernon Mwaanga =   Government was consulting locally and internationally and has no immediate intention of tabling the bill before parliament. This is partially because the ATI law would be difficult to implement and cope with.

MAY 2006 – Deputy Information Minister Benny Tetemashimba, = bill will be tabled in 2007 after exhaustive consultations with all stakeholders

JUNE 2006 – Information Minister Vernon Mwaanga= Government still consulting.

JANUARY 2008 – President Mwanawasa, = Govt will present bill before end of the year (2008).

JANUARY 2009 – President Rupiah Banda= Consultations on the ATI bill have reached an advanced stage.

AUGUST 2010 – Information Minister Lt. Gen. Ronnie Shikapwasha = Zambia is not ready for the ATI law. There is need for more consultations

OCTOBER 2011 – Vice President Guy Scott, later Acting President, = Government is keen to table the bill to parliament within 90 days but feared that it would be blocked by the opposition parties

DECEMBER 2011  – Information and tourism Minister Given Lubinda, = there is need for putting logistics in place to make sure that before the bill is enacted, all important issues are considered

FEBRUARY 2012  – Information and labour Minister Fackson Shamenda, = the planned law is not for the government but for practitioners, but government wants to listen more … exhaust consultations so that the bill could be  close to perfection before presenting it to parliament

JUNE 2012 – Information Permanent Secretary Amos Malupenga= A task force on the ATI law has completed its work on the draft bill. The bill would be ‘launched in a few days’ time for public scrutiny and input before submission to cabinet and parliament’

JULY 2013 – Information Minister Kennedy Sakeni, = the ATI draft bill will be forwarded to a parliamentary subcommittee on information and broadcasting before being considered by the cabinet and then submitted to parliament. However, before that, the government has to ensure that the bill has all the required ingredients before tabling it in parliament

DECEMBER 2013 – Information Minister Sakeni, – ATI Bill will be presented to Parliament within the first quarter of the coming year, 2014

FEBRUARY 2015 – Information Minister Chishimba Kambwili, = ATI bill will be tabled in parliament before end of sitting which ends on March 2015

MARCH 2015 – Information Minister Chishimba Kambwili, = ATI bill was sent to Attorney General’s Office for clearance pending presentation to Parliament.

Wednesday 3rd May 2017-Justice Minister Given Lubinda attributes Government procrastination on the Access To Information (ATI) bill to a backlog of legislative work required to operarationalize the January 2015 Amended Republican Constitution.

March 2022 – Information and Media Permanent Secretary Kennedy Kalulnga tells a PANOS Executive Director Vusumuzi Sifile and Teldah Mawarire of Inter News Network Zambia that government will take ATI document to all the 116 districts in 10 provinces as a means of wider consultations.

The above dazzlingly samples swings in Government positions on the ATI law over the past 19 years with the latest being the UPND leadership.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may have missed

绝妙集团公布50亿美元投资计划​作者:海伦·博瓦利亚(Hellen Bwalya)​绝妙集团有限公司(Wonderful Group of Companies Limited)通过其子公司赞比亚联合资本化肥有限公司(United Capital Fertilizer Zambia Company Limited),在其工业园区举行的奠基仪式上,正式启动了一项跨越2025年至2030年的50亿美元中长期工业投资宏伟计划。集团首席执行官黄耀弛先生在致答谢词时强调,该举措巩固了集团致力于提升赞比亚经济潜力、农业发展和就业水平的长期承诺。本次活动展示了多项价值数亿美元的制造业扩建及基础设施升级项目,旨在将赞比亚打造成中东非地区的核心工业强国。​在这项50亿美元的投资承诺中,园区内大规模的化工与化肥厂建设处于核心地位。继投资6.8亿美元的一期尿素生产厂竣工并投入运营后,集团正在稳步推进投资3.00亿美元的农化磷肥厂建设,预计将于第一季度投产,用于生产专用二铵(DAP)化肥。进一步的扩建计划还包括投资16亿美元的二期尿素项目和投资7.00亿美元的磷肥扩建项目,同时集团还将努力吸引更多绿色与高新技术投资者入驻运营。​为了支持这一工业增长并优化大宗运输物流,绝妙集团宣布了多项基础设施升级计划,包括升级连接当地矿山并穿过该工业园区的区域铁路网络、将蒙格维路(Mungwi Road)的部分路段改造为双向四车道,以及拓宽通往蒙布瓦路(Mumbwa Road)的连接线。这些基础设施项目将在完成内部财务手续后,通过政府与社会资本合作(PPP)模式实施,以畅通交通流量并缩短物资交付时间。黄耀弛先生对关键金融合作伙伴表达了谢意,向由艾莎银行(Absa Bank PLC)和赞比亚国家商业银行(ZANACO Bank PLC)牵头的银行银团为相关建设提供资金支持致以深切感谢。​在澄清公司身份时,黄耀弛先生指出,尽管早期外界存在误解,但绝妙集团和联合资本化肥公司均是值得骄傲的赞比亚本土企业。他强调,管理层中仅有两名中国籍员工,且均未直接参与日常运营,企业的行政控制权与管理权完全掌握在赞比亚本地人手中。黄耀弛先生重申了集团的承诺,并对赞比亚实现自产自销、对外出口以及引领东非和南部非洲工业未来的能力表达了坚定信心。