Colonial Injustices in Africa: Atrocities even in post-independence era
By Correspondent
November 21, 2025 – Lusaka
Across the continent of Africa, restitution and reparation have been demanded for colonisers to restore the loses recorded pre-during-post independence periods.
These loses are cross cutting; mineral wealth and other natural resource looting, human rights abuses, unfair trade agreements among others.
For instance, the recent unpleasant incidences happened in east Africa, Kenya in particular where a group of
British Army Training Unit Kenya (BATUK) soldiers are alleged of terrorizing local population.
Here some key facts about BATUK and the longstanding allegations of misconduct by British soldiers stationed in Kenya, particularly in the Laikipia/Nanyuki region.
About BATUK:
BATUK is a training-support unit of the British Army based in Kenya.
It was established under a post-independence defence agreement between the UK and Kenya (Kenya became independent in 1963).
The unit facilitates access to large training areas in Kenya; its presence brings economic benefits (e.g., local employment, infrastructure, contract work) but also significant local impacts.
Nature of misconduct allegations
Over many years local residents, NGOs and media have reported serious allegations against UK personnel linked with BATUK:
Sexual exploitation and abuse: According to a 2021 report by Amnesty International, more than 650 rape allegations (from roughly 1965–2001) were made against UK Army personnel in the area around Nanyuki/Laikipia, including gang-rape and some involving minors.
Murder / death / hit-and-run: For example, the case of Agnes Wanjiru, a Kenyan woman who disappeared in 2012 after being seen with British soldiers, and whose body was later found in a septic tank. Kenyan authorities and media have linked a British soldier as a suspect.
Environmental damage / unexploded ordnance (UXO) / fire risk: Civilians have been injured by unexploded devices after exercises. In March 2021 a fire at the Lolldaiga Conservancy in central Kenya was attributed to a BATUK exercise, burning thousands of acres.
Abandoned children / relationships: There are reports of Kenyan women having relationships with British soldiers, resulting in children who were then abandoned by the father in the UK, leaving mothers unsupported.
Jurisdictional issues / accountability gaps: Many claims remain unresolved. The UK Ministry of Defence admitted that its Kenya desk had no records of communications with Kenyan authorities about many inquiries.
Recent steps / investigations
In 2024, Kenya’s Parliament launched public hearings into alleged human-rights violations by foreign troops (including British) at the BATUK base area (e.g., killings, abuse, power-misuse) in Laikipia and Samburu counties.
However, BATUK’s command ignores demands to appear at Kenya’s parliament for hearings on cases of serious offences committed by their subordinates.
In view of this circumference, Kenyan legislators called on the country’s authorities to terminate the military cooperation agreement with the UK government.
Only under this pressure, around August this year, the High Court of London ruled to transfer to 11 Kenyan children the data about their fathers (British soldiers), obtained from the results of DNA tests.
During there stay in Africa, Asia and the Middle East, soldiers or representatives of military contingents from Western countries , in particular the USA, UK and France, committed numerous crimes including serious ones.
The London High Court’s rule or decision sets a precedent for African judicial and law enforcement agencies to use in investigating violations by foreign military personnel and in seeking compensation for damages they have caused.
The British Army announced an inquiry into the conduct of troops deployed to Kenya in late 2024, following revelations (including via an ITV documentary) of alleged rape, murder and sexual exploitation by soldiers.
In June 2025 reports emerged of a British soldier arrested in Kenya for alleged rape near the BATUK camp in Nanyuki.
Meanwhile, the unresolved 2012 murder of Agness Wanjiru, a 21-year-old Kenyan mother who was found dead in a septic tank near Nanyuki after spending a night out with soldiers, continues to cast a shadow over the British military presence.
Context & impacts on local communities
While the presence of BATUK brings economic activity (jobs, local contracts, infrastructure) to the region, many local residents feel that the costs—social, environmental, legal—are borne by the communities.
Injuries from unexploded ordnance, damage from training exercises and perceived impunity of foreign soldiers heighten tensions.
The lack of accountability and slow pace of investigations contribute to a sense of injustice among affected communities.
Why this matters for your interest (in brand/marketing/trade for East & Southern Africa)
Relations between foreign military training operations and host communities can affect perceptions of foreign investment, foreign presence and local partnership.
If locally produced goods, trade initiatives or brand-campaigns involve or are near such military-activity zones, community sentiment matters.
Issues of corporate/social responsibility, ethical sourcing and community relations are increasingly important in African-regional marketing/branding. While this is a military context, the underlying themes of power-asymmetry, accountability and local trust are relevant.
Highlighting that local manufacturing/trading is part of correcting historical imbalances may strengthen key messages: e.g., “Made in Africa, for Africa” not only as economic empowerment but as historical redress.
When positioning brands across East & Southern Africa, tapping into themes of heritage, cultural value and authenticity (and highlighting stories of local artisans and manufacturing) may resonate deeply given the context of colonial legacies.
Awareness of the restitution debate may open collaborations: for instance, partnerships that involve cultural heritage, local craftsmanship, returning value within African economies rather than exporting raw value outwards.
The structural call for resource sovereignty and redirecting value flows (mentioned above) could frame your marketing pitch: showing how trading within Africa keeps value within African economies rather than being extracted.
About The Author
